Ace the 2026 CGFM Exam – Turbocharge Your Path to Financial Mastery!

The consideration of other accounting literature from standard-setting bodies in the absence of guidance from the FASAB hierarchy is rooted in the need for consistency and reliability in financial reporting. The Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB) establishes standards that are crucial for federal government accounting, but when specific guidance is lacking, it is vital to refer to other authoritative sources for additional frameworks or standards that can inform accounting practices.

This includes literature from recognized standard-setting bodies such as the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) or the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), which provide valuable insights and methodologies that can be adapted for use by federal entities. Utilizing these other resources ensures that the accounting practices remain aligned with generally accepted accounting principles and broader financial reporting standards, even when specific FASAB guidance is not available.

The other options presented do not provide the broad and applicable guidance needed in such situations. Focusing solely on intergovernmental agreements, local government practices, or economic forecasts would be too narrow and may not encompass the array of relevant accounting principles necessary for sound financial decision-making in the absence of FASAB directives. Therefore, considering the literature from other standard-setting organizations is the most comprehensive and effective approach.